Search for: "Epstein v. Long"
Results 61 - 80
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2018, 7:15 am
Tribe, Sanford V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 6:01 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, and Matthew V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:04 am
See Magwood v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
Shiner v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Epstein’s views have had a long-lasting effect. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 17 May 2023, the Court of Appeal issued the costs order [pdf] in the long running Banks v Cadwalladr case ([2023] EWCA Civ 219). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:48 am
Race—in the case of a § 1981 claim—can be one of many causes of a defendant’s challenged action; as long as it is one cause-in-fact, it is actionable. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Tim Epstein will moderate the panel discussion, with Gabe Feldman and me as the panelists.A webcast of the event is available. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:17 am
Epstein ed. 1935). [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
In Forbes, University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein discusses two cases – Alvarez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:18 am
Still, given the tens of millions of abortions performed since Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am
” The Court Grants Reargument Last March, however, the Epstein case took on new life following a motion to reargue by Epstein who argued that Steinbeck was overruled sub silentio by the Court of Appeals’ 2018 opinion in Congel v Malfitano, a wrongful partnership dissolution case that I wrote about here, in which the Court, quoting from a 1939 Court of Appeals opinion in Lanier v Bowdoin, wrote: The partners of either a general or limited partnership,… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Bowers v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" eBay v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Cir., No. 14-508 and King v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
” (citing Chamberlain v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" [emphasis added by LawPundit]In supporting Justice McKenna and in not supporting Justice Harlan, Epstein is as wrong as those who supported Justice Henry Billings Brown (who never earned a law degree) in Plessy v. [read post]
