Search for: "Ex Parte Nixon"
Results 61 - 80
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
I certainly do not think that it violates the Constitution.On the constitutionality front, Ex Parte Grossman is a difficult obstacle for any would-be claim of unconstitutionality. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
I certainly do not think that it violates the Constitution.On the constitutionality front, Ex Parte Grossman is a difficult obstacle for any would-be claim of unconstitutionality. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
., Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259-60 (1839); accord PCAOB v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:39 pm
"It's just another place at Duke for boys and girls to meet other boys and girls," an ex-Chronicle heavy once told me. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 12:38 pm
In Ex parte Garland, which involved President Andrew Johnson’s pardon of a lawyer who had served in the legislature of the Confederacy, the court indicated that the president’s pardon power covers all federal offenses. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:18 pm
In the case of the German U-boat saboteurs, as the Supreme Court considered their habeas petitions in Ex parte Quirin, FDR quietly let it be known that they were going to be shot regardless. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
See, e.g., State ex rel. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 3:31 pm
This is not like 1968 when Vietnam split the Party (and put Nixon in the White House). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The presidency, for its own part, has massive first-mover advantages, strong pressures to accrue more and more power over time, and—even in the unlikely event that legal barriers to the use of force are enacted—an ability to avoid constraints via creative legal theories. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
In 1908, Justice Peckham wrote for the Court in Ex Parte Young: “It would not be wonderful if, under such circumstances, there would not be a crowd of agents offering to disobey the law. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
In 1908, Justice Peckham wrote for the Court in Ex Parte Young: “It would not be wonderful if, under such circumstances, there would not be a crowd of agents offering to disobey the law. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
“Read as part of this more natural sequence,” he writes, “the removal language of Article II places no necessary restriction on the class of officials who may be impeached, convicted and penalized” (emphasis added ). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:33 am
Mueller’s analysis on this question starts with Nixon v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
” Several courts have taken the position that they have inherent authority to go beyond the strictures of Rule 6(e) and release grand jury information—records relating to the investigation of Chicago Tribune staff members for espionage in 1942, for instance, as well as ex-President Nixon’s testimony from 1975. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
There appears to be some confusion surrounding the question of whether a president can pardon himself. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Minnesota ex rel. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
Acknowledging his own status as a longtime political opponent of then-President Richard Nixon, Black nonetheless expresses “a very strong sense of the dreadfulness of the step of removal. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm
President Lincoln never ignored an order from Chief Justice Taney in Ex Parte Merryman. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978) (footnotes omitted); see Ex parte Uppercu, 239 U.S. 435, 439–41(1915). [read post]
