Search for: "F. A.D. I."
Results 61 - 80
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2014, 2:25 pm
Special Financing, Inc., 414 F.3d 325 (2d Cir. 2005). [3] Stern v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
However, New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew F. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 12:33 pm
The rest of our nations religions can go f*&^ off. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
McElduff, 101 A.D.3d 832, 954 N.Y.S.2d 891 [2nd Dept 2012]). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
McElduff, 101 A.D.3d 832, 954 N.Y.S.2d 891 [2nd Dept 2012]). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Neither Westlaw nor Lexis has the case, and the case found at 925 F.3d 1339 is A.D. v Azar, 925 F.3d 1291 (D.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
No. 2009-20, § I, 8-20-09) [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Cassieri, 31 A.D.2d 927, 298 N.Y.S.2d 844), they are no longer to be followed. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
Burgaleta, 34 A.D. 686 (2nd Dept. 2006). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:11 am
Hartnett, 129 A.D.2d 894, 895, 514 N.Y.S.2d 530, commenting that in that ruling the State’s Appellate Division noted that “invocation of a grievance procedure will not serve to toll the statutory time limit prescribed by CPLR [Section] 217” for the purposes of Article 78 proceedings.The points of the ruling to be remembered:1. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Pfizer Inc., 58 A.D.3d 138, 141 (N.Y. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:12 am
[Christopher F.], 74 A.D.3d 1454, 1455 [2010]; Matter of Stampfler v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
I have, in these pages, detailed the efforts of the now defunct Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy (SKAPP) to undermine any gatekeeping of scientific opinion testimony for scientific or statistical validity. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
Sliker,751 F.2d 477, 497 [2d Cir1984]; see 1–4 New York Evidentiary Foundations § A [2016] ). [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 pm
In Lumpenepidemiology, I detailed how one federal judge, the Hon. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The 2016 Guidelines provide that A[i]f the child may be involuntarily removed from the parents or Indian custodian or the child may be involuntarily placed, then ICWA applies to the proceeding. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
Bishop, 170 A.D.3d 642, 644, 95 N.Y.S.3d 317) Comment: Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][9][b][2][i] provides, in part: The court may modify an order of child support, including an order incorporating without merging an agreement or stipulation of the parties, upon a showing of a substantial change in circumstances. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:49 am
McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 599 F. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
BR a.D. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
I don't think this is consistent with how libel law sees things, and I want to explain why. [read post]
