Search for: "FISH v. LACK" Results 61 - 80 of 879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:26 am
Wedgetail sued Huddleston Deluxe for infringing its fishing lure patent. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:33 am by Barry Eagar
Case:  Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83ConstructionThe fish stunning machine covered by the patents had a fish stunning device, a fish guide and a trigger. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Given the detailed 64-page analysis of the likely impact on individual species of fish in the 2001 EIS, the complete lack of such analysis of the likely impact on individual species of fish in the 2004 EIS, and the lack of any explanation in the 2004 EIS why it is not 'reasonably possible' to perform some level of analysis of such impact, we have no choice but to conclude that the Forest Service failed to take the requisite 'hard look'… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:08 pm by Walter James
Apollo/Walker (decided June 30, 2010) is a Tenth Circuit case under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) that provides a very good discussion of the mens rea requirement (or lack thereof). [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:25 pm by WIMS
      The delta smelt is a small fish endemic to the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers Delta Estuary which was declared endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act in 1993. [read post]