Search for: "FORD MOTOR CO. v. FORD" Results 61 - 80 of 938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2022, 7:18 am by Evan Brown
The Net Inc., 388 F.3d 201 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:19 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919), is a case in... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:28 am by IncNow
Ford Motor Co. established this principle when defendant Henry Ford progressively lowered the prices of his cars and withheld dividends from stockholders when he learned of the Dodge brothers’ plan to cash out their shares in Ford Motor and start their own car company. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the breach of fiduciary duty causes of action, “where an allegation of fraud is essential to a breach of fiduciary duty claim, courts have applied a six-year statute of limitations under CPLR 213 (8)” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009], rearg denied 12 NY3d 889 [2009]; see Monaghan v Ford Motor Co., 71 AD3d 848, 849-850 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s like saying that, because Ford Motor Co. has published corporate histories in its name, sponsors Masterpiece Theater, and creates extensive social media content, “Ford Motor Company” is now a title for Rogers purposes, or that the existence of The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History or The Code: An Authorized History of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codemakes those entities into titles for Rogers purposes. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 (Vandermark), reasoning, “Retailers like manufacturers are engaged in the business of distributing goods to the public. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ford Motor Co., --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2021 WL 2700347, No. 17-21087-CIV-MORENO (S.D. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ford Motor Co., 312 F.3d 998, 1010 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Yet, at a minimum, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas are open to rethinking due process along originalist lines (see Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 2 – Copyright Enforcement: Faye Fangfei Wang, Resolving Copyright-related Cases Over the Internet with the Assistance of Artificial  Intelligence in Europe Automated notice and takedown/Content ID with appeal mechanism as an example of how the new European rules are supposed to work. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:21 pm by Amanda Frost
In April 2020, a month after New York Times reporter Adam Liptak wrote about Covert and Wang’s data, the Supreme Court denied a request by the SG’s office to participate in oral argument as amicus in support of Ford Motor Co. in Ford v. [read post]