Search for: "Fall v. State Bar"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,851
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Instead of rejecting Texas’s theory on the merits, the courts have thus far said that the political question doctrine “bars consideration” of the argument. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
The argument concerned four applications from industrial polluters and allied States (consolidated under Ohio v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:44 am
” “Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses of the Southern District of New York recently addressed this issue in Bonde v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
” State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
—b/c the TM bar sensed a risk of loss, of limitation. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
The district court dismissed the case on the ground that the suit was barred under NAACP v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm
See also Anaconda Copper Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
When National Guard troops are called into federal service, they immediately fall under the DOD chain of command and are thus subject to the PCA. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Tam and Brunetti, striking down various bars on registration. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
June 14, 2023) — ruling that communications between South Dakota state officials and the National Guard (a hybrid state-federal entity) did not fall within Exemption 5’s consultant corollary exception because they were not made for purpose of aiding the National Guard’s deliberations; noting that its ruling “produced an odd outcome considering that these discussions would be protected either under Exemption 5 (if wholly federal) and under South… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm
This principle was established in Thaler v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The complaint claims that the “burden for that massive overpayment” falls on J&J ERISA plans and participants, who generally pay out-of-pocket for a portion of that inflated price. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]