Search for: "Fed Ex" Results 61 - 80 of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Appellant wins on 112 P 6 in Ex parte MCCARTY
9 May 2013, 9:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Aoyama, 656 F.3d 1293, 1296 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
PTAB decision in Ex parte Florian
30 Jun 2015, 1:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ans. 5As to motivation:We add that “[i]f theproposed modification would render the prior artinvention being modified unsatisfactory for its intended purpose, then thereis no suggestion or motivationto make the proposed modification.In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902(Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Appellant prevails in Ex parte NOGUCHI
9 Dec 2013, 6:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Jung, 637 F.3d 1356, 1363 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Examiner reversed in Ex parte FILLATTI
9 Aug 2013, 1:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The examiner was reversed in Ex parte FILLATTI. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Board reverses in Ex parte GERHARDINGER
13 Feb 2013, 5:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Robertson, 169 F.3d 743, 745 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Obviousness affirmed in Ex parte Karr
27 Dec 2012, 7:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
from Ex parte LIVERSIDGE
15 Apr 2013, 7:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
from Ex parte LIVERSIDGE As stated in In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Cal.2d: Fed Ex package in transit opened without warrant suppressed
26 Oct 2011, 5:12 am
A package consigned to Fed Ex “reeked of marijuana. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
112 rejections sustained in Ex parte BOUGHANNAM
15 May 2013, 9:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Revel, 984 F.2d1164, 1170 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
In re Best issues discussed in Ex parte Colburn
11 Mar 2013, 9:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Dudas, 492 F.3d 1365, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
In Ex parte FITZPATRICK appellant loses on anticipation, wins on obviousness
10 Jan 2014, 8:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From Ex parte FITZPATRICK In a non-precedential decision, our reviewing court reminded us of the 2 applicability of the precedential In re Gulack, 703 F.2d 1381 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Non-functional descriptive material discussed in Ex parte Lee
22 Apr 2013, 7:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Ngai, 367F.3d 1336, 1339 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Ex parte Dick on secondary considerations
29 Jan 2014, 9:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Co., 864 F.2d 757, 769 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Md. high court finds state’s gun-control provision stricter than fed’s
29 Apr 2022, 1:45 pm by Steve Lash
The post Md. high court finds state’s gun-control provision stricter than fed’s first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
On the Record - http://thedailyrecord.com/ontherecord/
PTAB affirms rejections in Ex parte Frisa
4 Feb 2014, 10:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Saint-Gobain Corp., 572 F.3d 1371, 1380 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Ex parte Hosoi
3 Mar 2013, 5:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Medichem S.A. v.Rolabo S.L., 437 F.3d 1157, 1165 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
In re Jung (2011) cited in Ex parte Lee
1 Apr 2013, 8:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Jung, 637 F.3d1356, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
In re Nuijten cited in Ex parte ZONDERVAN
19 Jun 2013, 7:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Bigio, 381 F.3d 1320, 1325 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
"Unhappy with the Ex parte Appeal Rule? Read This Now"
8 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
Belzer (former White House staff economist)-->BACKGROUNDToday the PTO published a notice in the Federal Register inviting public comments on paperwork burdens associated with the Ex parte Appeal Rule (73 Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
"Feds: Send him to prison; The ex-Qwest CEO must show his verdict is wrong, the filing says."
17 Mar 2009, 4:12 pm
"Feds: Send him to prison; The ex-Qwest CEO must show his verdict is wrong, the filing says. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.law.com/