Search for: "Feuer v Feuer" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Trusts EstatesProf
Albert Feuer (Law Offices of Albert Feuer) has recently published an article entitled, The Supreme Court Federal Life Insurance Rules Preempt State Law in Hillman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:40 am by laborprof lpb
Readers may find of interest Albert Feuer's recent article, The Supreme Court Finds Federal Life Insurance Rules Preempt State Law in Hillman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Retiree’s application to change the retirement option selected filed more than thirty days after her effective date of retirement rejected as untimely Feuer v State of New York, 2012 NY Slip Op 09129, Appellate Division, Third Department Prior to retiring in June 2009, a teacher, a Tier 4 member of the New York State Teachers' Retirement System [TRS], met her financial advisor and a TRS representative for a preretirement consultation. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm by Trusts EstatesProf
Albert Feuer (Attorney at Law, Forest Hills, NY) recently published his article entitled, CIGNA v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:00 am by Trusts EstatesProf
Albert Feuer (Attorney, Forest Hills, NY) recently published his article entitled The Kennedy Supreme Court Giveth with Footnote 13, But Taketh with Footnote 10: The Department of Labor and Many Lower Courts Miss the Decision's Ultimate Meaning, 39 Compensation Planning... [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Dem 58th (916) 319-2058 Carter, Wilmer Amina Dem 62nd (916) 319-2062 Chesbro, Wesley Dem 1st (916) 319-2001 Conway, Connie Rep… [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:16 pm by Cal Law
Supreme Court decisions removing limits on independent campaign expenditures by corporations (Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:13 pm
" According to the abstract: In Metropolitan Life v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
" The new law reverses a recent California Supreme Court decisions (Van Horn v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:41 am
I thought, for reasons of both vanity and timeliness, I would start with a couple of items on the Supreme Court’s decision in Kennedy v. [read post]