Search for: "Fine v. Denny" Results 61 - 80 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As relevant here, the current version of the prohibition states:(A) Subject to the exceptions provided in part (B), whoever knowingly enters a sensitive place while carrying a firearm shall be guilty of a felony punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 and imprisonment for up to five years. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Dennis, 237 F.3d 1295, 1303 (11th Cir. 2001), the Eleventh Circuit held that a “[a] conviction can be sustained under either [section] when the indictment… charge[s] both clauses. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The magazine’s publishers now face a substantial fine. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm by Michael
Being a bully is fine–as long as you grow up to become a lawyer! [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 8:30 am
 If so, you should consult Kenneth Vanko's fine analysis and practical pointers from a recent New Jersey case, Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co [1944] A.C. 265, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that “[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by Ray Dowd
  Check out the full table of contents here.www.dunnington.com Copyright law, fine art and navigating the courts. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm by LundgrenJohnson
These two categories include a number of fine-tuned instances in which certain statements are by definition not hearsay. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Halverson, 126 Iowa 125, 127, 101 N.W. 781 (1904) (reversing judgment for defendant dog owner because although plaintiff could not show which defendant’s dog killed which sheep, the jury should have been allowed to consider defendant’s liability with proper instructions on apportionment), Denny v. [read post]