Search for: "Finkelstein v Finkelstein"
Results 61 - 80
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
” Because review of NAC’s liability insurance policies to determine their potential applicability to the judgment in the underlying action fell outside the scope of HSE’s engagement, the court properly granted HSE’s motion with respect to the professional negligence/legal malpractice cause of action against HSE insofar as asserted by NAC (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:41 am
NYCERS v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 1:38 pm
Park of the University of California Hastings College of Law, and colleagues, have published Bayes Wars Redivivus — An Exchange, International Commentary on Evidence, v. 8, no. 1, article 1 (2010). [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:19 am
LED Technologies Pty Ltd v Roadvision Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 146 // [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
" pjblack.me/x9j9Yh #lwb486 #lws008 from @mashable: "Pinterest to Release New Profile Pages This Week" pjblack.me/zlrdkZ from the australian: "Sydney Uni before Fair Work Australia" pjblack.me/yi8TmO #highered good point: "It’s not curation or aggregation, it’s just how the Internet works" says @mathewi pjblack.me/ypzORr defending the finkelstein inquiry into the media: "Finkelstein gets a bad… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:56 pm
" SCAM - West Des Moines lawyer Steve Lombardi on his blog, The Iowa Edict Bowoto v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property
Dismissal of Patent Coinventorship Claim Over Cut Diamond's Design Not Reconsidered
Finkelstein v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Finkelstein and Richard W. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
” Because review of NAC’s liability insurance policies to determine their potential applicability to the judgment in the underlying action fell outside the scope of HSE’s engagement, the court properly granted HSE’s motion with respect to the professional negligence/legal malpractice cause of action against HSE insofar as asserted by NAC (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
By way of example, in Marshall v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Milward v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
” The Court of Appeals recently reiterated that sentiment in Thyroff v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
Finkelstein (New York, NY)Arista v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
Supreme Court's decision this year limiting the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
See also, Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27 (1st Dept 2000), Iv denied 95 NY2d 759, cert denied sub nom Dim v Snyder, 531 US 1158 (2001); Finkelstein v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
In this regard, cases hold that “[a]n attorney who violates a disciplinary rule may be discharged for cause … ” (Doviak v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699 [2d Dept 2011 ]). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
