Search for: "Fischer v Fischer" Results 61 - 80 of 994
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Electron Hydro, LLC and Fischer (Clean Water Act) Pueblo of Pojoaque and Buffalo Thunder, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm by Joanna Powis and Jonathan Lord
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd, a gender… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Aaron Moss
” A Few Thoughts In issuing a stay last year, Judge Fischer was no doubt hoping that Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:25 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Fischer & Associates, Inc., 310 So. 3d 45, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (storing trade secrets on password protected server constituted reasonable protections); but see Physiotherapy Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am by SHG
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Eichinger, P.C., 35 AD3d 558, 559; Khadem v Fischer & Kagan, 215 AD2d 441, 442). [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:37 am by Katherine Pompilio
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has granted a stay of a previous ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bruce Fischer, Esq., P.C., 78 AD3d 1016, 1018; see also Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989, 991; Weiner v Hershman & Leicher, 248 AD2d 193, 193; cf. [read post]