Search for: "Fisher v. Doe" Results 61 - 80 of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
The 9th (Paez joined by Fisher and Robart) held that it does. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm by Schachtman
Because the mid-p value will always be larger than the one-sided exact p-value from Fisher’s Exact Test, the court’s explanation does not really make sense: “Instead, Dr. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) In general, I am not a fan of the “diversity” rationale for affirmative action, and I have considerable sympathy for plaintiffs’ position in Fisher v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:46 am
(After correcting some minor errors in the opinion and adding a more careful caveat or two than I wrote in the original opinion.)What does that leave you with? [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:01 pm by Michael O'Hear
I posted earlier this spring on the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:40 pm by charley foster
Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the Doe children do not reasonably fear severe harm, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing the case based on plaintiffs’ failure to disclose their identities.The appeal was heard by Circuit Judges Beezer, Graber and Fisher. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am by ktidgren
.: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 12:02 pm by Rosemary Campagna
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Fisher v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
 Is the court’s holding in Grutter inconsistent with the principles of Brown v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
 Is the court’s holding in Grutter inconsistent with the principles of Brown v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
Because the mid-p value will always be larger than the one-sided exact p-value from Fisher’s Exact Test, the court’s explanation does not really make sense: “Instead, Dr. [read post]