Search for: "Fowler v. a & a COMPANY" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am by James Kwong
As soon as the fee is paid, a verification in the form of a blue tick will be given (as a matter of several minutes in the experience of Geoffrey A Fowler of the Washington Post). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider, inter alia, whether the court should grant an injunction to restrain a company in insolvent liquidation from referring a dispute with a cross-claiming creditor to adjudication. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 The best that the company could do was wring a concession from Mr. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v… [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
 (10-277) — scope of right to bring class-action lawsuit for sex discrimination on the job; also question added by the Court Fowler v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:08 pm by WSLL
LEXSTAR DVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:59 am
Even chickens have trade secretsPhoto by Alex Harries The basic rule applicable to all employees, from the case of Faccenda Chicken v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 is that if an employee is entrusted with confidential information which is "of a sufficiently high degree of confidentiality as to amount to a trade secret", the duty of confidence continues after the termination of the contract of employment. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:03 am
Hilarie's analysis focuses on Young v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:20 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty "under the circumstances"King v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03098, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFigueroa v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03104, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the Court of Appeals explained in Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
 According to Caterpillar,despite the requirement laid down by the Court of Appeal in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 and Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis (1987) ICR 464 that the confidential information be identified, the court could still apply the principle established by the House of Lords in Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52 that an ex-employee can be barred from carrying out specified work for a new employer unless that employee is able to… [read post]