Search for: "Fund of Funds, Limited v. First American Fund of Funds"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 8:09 am
The Supreme Court has broken down this limit on federal funding and thereby enabled the flow of federal money to the states. [read post]
29 May 2017, 9:43 am
How to Manage Old Debt After Recent Supreme Court Ruling It’s easier for old debt to haunt American consumers seeking refuge in bankruptcy, thanks to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:15 pm
For example, in McCauley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In Davies v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
Montana (limited to question one); First American Financial v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
Health care law - obligation of Indian Health Services to fund the administration of Tribe run health care services has expanded - San Carlos Apache Tribe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
First, jurisdictions can limit the information they collect about their residents’ citizenship status. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:11 am
The FCC recently announced $1.3 million in funding was awarded to the first wave of second-window applicants (291 schools in 32 states). [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
” In Community Financial Services v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
The first was to harmonize risk assessment so that risk could be better embedded in the valuation of economic activity, and more particularly investment decisions by individuals and financial institutions. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
(I expect to assign the first article when I teach Johnson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Here is the abstract: The Court in January of 2010 rocked the nation when it decided Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
Moreover, the government funding cases have thus far been limited to situations where the government has chosen to limit funding to individuals that are advancing the goals underlying the program the government seeks to fund. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 12:08 pm
In 2003, in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
The Spending Clause in some circumstances gives the federal government power to achieve what it cannot directly command by creating monetary incentives for state and local governments.The spending authority, as it has been interpreted by the Court, is limited, however, in that it requires that any conditions the feds impose on the funding: (1) be clearly communicated to the states/cities up front, so the recipients can knowingly decide whether to accept the deal; (2) be rationally… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Advisers to pooled investment vehicles may avoid the independent party and surprise examinations requirements by having audited financial statements prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and distributing such audited financial statements to all limited partners (or members or other beneficial owners) of the pooled investment vehicle. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 11:31 pm
American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:03 am
Lamberth granted the motion of a whistleblower for a partial award of attorneys fees against two defendants in a long-running case involving a conspiracy to rig bids on American-funded infrastructure development projects in Egypt. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
We see this dynamic at work in our First Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
