Search for: "Gabe Roth"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 1:19 pm
Gabe Roth, the executive director of a nonpartisan group that advocates for more transparency at the Supreme Court, said in a statement that the code left “much to be desired. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Mississippi (Art Lien) A couple of blocks away, Gabe Roth of Fix the Court, an organization that has been hammering for more Supreme Court transparency, and other witnesses are testifying at a House Judiciary Committee subcommittee hearing on promoting ethics, accountability and transparency in the federal judiciary. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
In an op-ed for the Louis Post-Dispatch, Gabe Roth notes the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Court’s decision holding “that Missouri’s mandatory retirement age for state court judges did not violate federal law or the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:28 am
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Gabe Roth argues that although “the court’s self-referential docket” includes “a handful of suits that have parallels with how they act as stewards of their institution,” such as cases involving judicial recusals and mandatory retirement ages, the justices fail to change “their own practices in light of their holdings in these cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” Briefly: At the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “talk about the latest in SCOTUS fashion (an ‘I Dissent’ handbag)[,] chat with Fix the Court’s Gabe Roth[,and] catch up on two voting-related cases from North Carolina and Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
” In an op-ed for Bloomberg Law, Gabe Roth argues that “at a time when justices’ associations are coming under greater scrutiny,” the justices should go one step further and renounce their registration with any political party. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
In a column for The National Law Journal’s Supreme Court Brief (registration or subscription required), Gabe Roth criticizes the Court’s unwillingness to allow its oral arguments to be televised. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 11:16 am
Fix the Court’s Gabe Roth issued this statement in light of Chief Justice Roberts speaking up about impeachment threats against judges: “Chief Justice Roberts’ statement makes an important point, but it’s a little rich coming from the guy that, by giving Donald Trump near-total immunity in a major decision last year, helped usher in the present era of lawlessness. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am
” In his eponymous blog, John Barrett responds to a recent New York Times op-ed by Gabe Roth that chides the court for not applying its rulings to its own practices; Barrett points to flaws in Roth’s “list of particulars” and observes that it “only sets back public discourse, and it probably makes the Justices less receptive to sound reform proposals, to claim falsely that the Court is broken. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:15 am
” “Gabe Roth, executive director at Fix the Court said recusal calls on Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito presented much clearer conflicts. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
” Fix the Court executive director Gabe Roth thinks it shows the need for congressional action: “That a serial harasser is allowed to make a comeback without making amends is shameful. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a nonprofit that advocates for increased transparency at the Supreme Court, gets frustrated when justices casually invite people to come watch an oral argument, as Justice Stephen Breyer did at 27:18 of this Zoom video. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Gabe Roth maintains that Gorsuch’s chosen forum exemplified the regrettable tendency of the justices to “stick to U.S. audiences whose ideologies closely follow their own,” and urges “the one supposedly apolitical branch [to] branch[] out and address[] the unexpected. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
” In an op-ed in The Detroit News, Gabe Roth laments the court’s ban on videotaping of oral arguments, arguing that the court’s “refusal to allow a majority of the American people to experience their work as it transpires demonstrates a level of contempt for public discourse that is confounding. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:10 am
"Six years on the Board is a long time, so, to quote the federal recusal law, her 'impartiality' in the case — that is, in favor of Harvard, given her ties to the Board — 'might reasonably be questioned' here, meaning disqualification is required," according to Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that advocates for reforms. . . . [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm
In a statement at the time, Gabe Roth of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that advocates for reforms to make the federal judiciary more accountable to the American people, said that the bill was intended to “help litigants and the general public identify conflicts” in real time. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” Briefly: In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Gabe Roth contends that the Justices should not have life tenure and instead argues that “[s]tandardized, 18-year, non-renewable terms for Supreme Court justices would be ideal. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Gabe Roth argues that any justices who hold stock in technology companies should divest themselves before participating in Microsoft because, “[i]ntentionally or not, these justices may be profiting from how they vote. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:31 am
” “Gabe Roth, the executive director of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that presses for greater transparency and accountability by the justices, agreed that the omission did not violate the law. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required), Gabe Roth contends that the federal cameras-in-courts pilot program was doomed to fail, concluding that, “until Chief Justice Roberts . . . understands how increased transparency works hand-in-hand with the rule of law, any pilot program designed by the neo-Luddites who currently make up the [judiciary] will crash and burn. [read post]
