Search for: "Gabe Roth"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Mississippi (Art Lien) A couple of blocks away, Gabe Roth of Fix the Court, an organization that has been hammering for more Supreme Court transparency, and other witnesses are testifying at a House Judiciary Committee subcommittee hearing on promoting ethics, accountability and transparency in the federal judiciary. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
In a column for The National Law Journal’s Supreme Court Brief (registration or subscription required), Gabe Roth criticizes the Court’s unwillingness to allow its oral arguments to be televised. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
In an op-ed for the Louis Post-Dispatch, Gabe Roth notes the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Court’s decision holding “that Missouri’s mandatory retirement age for state court judges did not violate federal law or the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” Briefly: At the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “talk about the latest in SCOTUS fashion (an ‘I Dissent’ handbag)[,] chat with Fix the Court’s Gabe Roth[,and] catch up on two voting-related cases from North Carolina and Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
” In an op-ed for Bloomberg Law, Gabe Roth argues that “at a time when justices’ associations are coming under greater scrutiny,” the justices should go one step further and renounce their registration with any political party. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:28 am
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Gabe Roth argues that although “the court’s self-referential docket” includes “a handful of suits that have parallels with how they act as stewards of their institution,” such as cases involving judicial recusals and mandatory retirement ages, the justices fail to change “their own practices in light of their holdings in these cases. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am
” In his eponymous blog, John Barrett responds to a recent New York Times op-ed by Gabe Roth that chides the court for not applying its rulings to its own practices; Barrett points to flaws in Roth’s “list of particulars” and observes that it “only sets back public discourse, and it probably makes the Justices less receptive to sound reform proposals, to claim falsely that the Court is broken. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
” Fix the Court executive director Gabe Roth thinks it shows the need for congressional action: “That a serial harasser is allowed to make a comeback without making amends is shameful. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a nonprofit that advocates for increased transparency at the Supreme Court, gets frustrated when justices casually invite people to come watch an oral argument, as Justice Stephen Breyer did at 27:18 of this Zoom video. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:10 am
"Six years on the Board is a long time, so, to quote the federal recusal law, her 'impartiality' in the case — that is, in favor of Harvard, given her ties to the Board — 'might reasonably be questioned' here, meaning disqualification is required," according to Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that advocates for reforms. . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 4:17 am
In a New York Times op-ed, Gabe Roth writes about how the Supreme Court justices are conflicted, voting their pocketbook if not their feelz. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm
In a statement at the time, Gabe Roth of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that advocates for reforms to make the federal judiciary more accountable to the American people, said that the bill was intended to “help litigants and the general public identify conflicts” in real time. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Gabe Roth maintains that Gorsuch’s chosen forum exemplified the regrettable tendency of the justices to “stick to U.S. audiences whose ideologies closely follow their own,” and urges “the one supposedly apolitical branch [to] branch[] out and address[] the unexpected. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:31 am
” “Gabe Roth, the executive director of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that presses for greater transparency and accountability by the justices, agreed that the omission did not violate the law. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” Briefly: In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Gabe Roth contends that the Justices should not have life tenure and instead argues that “[s]tandardized, 18-year, non-renewable terms for Supreme Court justices would be ideal. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 8:15 am
Gabe Roth is the executive director of Fix the Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 10:48 am
Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, presented a different view. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required), Gabe Roth contends that the federal cameras-in-courts pilot program was doomed to fail, concluding that, “until Chief Justice Roberts . . . understands how increased transparency works hand-in-hand with the rule of law, any pilot program designed by the neo-Luddites who currently make up the [judiciary] will crash and burn. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Gabe Roth argues that any justices who hold stock in technology companies should divest themselves before participating in Microsoft because, “[i]ntentionally or not, these justices may be profiting from how they vote. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
” In an op-ed in The Detroit News, Gabe Roth laments the court’s ban on videotaping of oral arguments, arguing that the court’s “refusal to allow a majority of the American people to experience their work as it transpires demonstrates a level of contempt for public discourse that is confounding. [read post]
