Search for: "General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Diane Marie Amann
Livingston (1964), and further declined to privilege what the Court in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., in which the court held:[Plaintiff] argues that her suit will have no regulatory effect because [defendant] has the choice of paying the damages award without modifying the design of its vehicles. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am by David Garcia and Leo Caseria
  However, a number of Justices were struggling with whether and how an arbitration agreement with a class action waiver could be reconciled with the “effective vindication doctrine” set forth in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Gordon Burns, Deputy State Solicitor General, James M. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
General Motors Corp., 2009 WL 1034487 (Del.Super. 2009) Benzene Knight v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm by support
” The auto alliance includes General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Group LLC, Toyota and eight others. [read post]