Search for: "George v. Davis"
Results 61 - 80
of 502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
Davis & Nicholas R. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
Surveillance David Davis MP and others are calling for a ban on the Chinese surveillance camera brands Hikvision and Dahua, used by UK government bodies. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
On 28 June 2022, there will be a hearing/application in Emmy Tayler v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:44 am
Supreme Court cases: Lucia v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
As Judge Davis noted in his dissenting opinion in Jarkesy, “nowhere does the majority explain how the ALJ’s tenure protections interfere with the President’s ability to execute the laws. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 12:07 pm
The Supreme Court defined peer harassment in Davis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am
Moldovan MPs have passed a ban on Russian war symbols, including the letters Z and V and the St George ribbon. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
” Estate of Davis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
As the great Senate historian George Haynes has documented, many U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Part Two detailed the line of Supreme Court precedent going back more than a century rejecting ISL premises, at least in federal election contexts (as distinguished from other places the Constitution refers to state “legislatures”), including Davis v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
”The matter is really no different from what Chief Justice John Marshall said in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
Flowers (5th Cir. 1990) (involving restrictions on the speech of governmental employees), and reiterated in In re Davis (Tex. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Jensen, 21-210: Whether a woman’s statement that if she died, her husband should be considered a suspect, is (after her death) “testimonial” and thus barred under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause George v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
Saini J has dismissed the claims in libel, slander per se and malicious falsehood in George v Cannell & another. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
