Search for: "German v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,990
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:35 am
United States, 838 F.2d 1280 (D.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:50 am
., a jurisdiction in which the parties don't have any infringement actions pending against each other, but where the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) instituted an inter partes review (IPR) roughly a year ago relating to U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
COLI BACTERIA Escherichia coli (or E. coli)is the most prevalent infecting organism in the family of gram-negative bacteria known as enterobacteriaceae. [1] E. coli bacteria were discovered in the human colon in 1885 by German bacteriologist Theodor Escherich. [2] Dr. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:14 am
Case date: 09 May 2023 Case number: No. 22-1291 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
In a press release, Panasonic stated it expects ‘relevant actions will develop and proceed in parallel in Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), the newly established European Unified Patent Court (UPC) and China’. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 1:29 am
Case date: 08 August 2023 Case number: No. 21-1813 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
German) and Eastern (e.g. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
United States, in which the Could upheld the forced relocation of all people of Japanese descent on the West Coast just because of their ancestry. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:48 am
Lenovo, Optis v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
The decision clarifies that a technical effect may be plausible without requiring the provision of tests or data; this is precisely the opposite of what was decided by Judge Arnold in the United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
In July 2022, the American Bar Association weighed in on the internecine legal warfare between political activist attorneys and state bar associations this way: “In June 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Janus v. [read post]