Search for: "Givens v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 61 - 80 of 439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2013, 2:43 pm by Monique Altheim
  Google’s Forum-Selection Clause Upheld AgainRudgayzer v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The allocation required by these amendments is not fair given the further misalignment of incentives that it encourages. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am by Rosalind English
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
Even apart from the scant factual basis for the Commission’s given reason for needing the no-deny policy, it should be reexamined because a regulatory policy that prevents people from speaking against government action necessarily raises First Amendment concerns. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:49 am by Legal Beagle
I believe that this censorship was draconian given that details of own case, Stott v Minogue 2000 SLT (Sh Ct) 25, & GWD 36-1386, - which spawned the petition – and the decision by the Social Security Commissioner, Ref: CS1/136/02. are in part matters of public record, or have been reported widely in the press and legal journals and are the two most important Scottish cases that deal with the influence of freemasonry in the justice system. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
The fact that current data practices can have such consequential effects heightens both the importance of wielding the full set of tools that Congress has given us, as well as the responsibility we have to do so. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Matthew Flinn
R (Moos and Anor) v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 957 (Admin) – Read Judgment The High Court has decided that the actions of police in “kettling” climate change protestors during the G20 summit were unlawful. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:51 am
The IRS could have done a computer search through the DMV, contacted Terrell's employer, searched using Terrell’s social security number, or undertaken any number of actions that might have located the Dallas address. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am by Andres
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The materials sought related to the investigation of two complaints filed with the Office of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District (SCI) concerning whether a speech that was given by an employee of the New York State Department of Education (DOE) at a public high school and later reproduced on DOE's website violated Chancellor's Regulations D-130(I)(B)(2), (I)(B)(8), and (I)(C)(1). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
type=live&comm=uscc&filename=uscc012518 (link is external)Thursday, January 25, 2018Location: Dirksen 419Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:45 AM – 9:50 AM:           Opening Remarks: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:50 AM – 11:20 PM:          Panel I: Mercantilism with Chinese… [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The ICO said it had a “legal duty to carry out an impartial assessment of the evidence available” given the “seriousness of the report and the wider implications it potentially had for the security of information across government”. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am by MBettman
James receives his social security benefits by direct deposit in a Florida bank, and does not file any federal, state, or local income tax returns that list the Ohio house as his residence. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Catherine Coulter
With regard to the Privacy Commissioner’s findings, the use of video surveillance and GPS is generally not permitted for productivity management although it may be permitted if the employer can show a bona fide safety or security reason for the surveillance. [read post]