Search for: "Givens v. Hill"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,069
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:05 am
In StarNet Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
”Since the step wasn’t defective, and S.M. and had ascended (moments prior) without incident, and, given that it was a “sunny day,” and her view was “unobstructed,” the AD2 agreed that the litigation had been properly dismissed.Talk about a misstep ….# # #DECISIONS.M. v Fairfield Hills E., LLC [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
Thus, given the Planning Authority’s clear understanding of this area in terms of conservation and given my assessment that the feature of one thatched roof on this modest single-storey new building will not have any deleterious effect on the churchyard and the church, I see no basis for refusing that aspect of the peti [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am
Hille, 180 So. 3d 634, 652 (¶60) (Miss. 20 [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Nearly a decade later, in Hill v Church of Scientology, the Court clarified that this residual relevance obliges courts to engage in principled balancing, weighing Charter values against “the principles which underlie the common law,” and using those values as “guidelines for any modification to the common law which the court feels is necessary” (Hill, para 97). [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Menendez Indictment Revives Concerns Over Money and Influence in Politics Yahoo News – Taylor Giorno (The Hill) | Published: 10/11/2023 U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Campbell and Hill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 5:50 am
Apparently referring to the Supreme Court’s holding in INS v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In Powell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:13 pm
From today's decision by Judge Paul Oetken in Atas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Among many others, The Guardian, USA Today, The Hill, Reuters, and Talking Points Memo came calling. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm
Arnold & Associates, LPA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
” City of Detroit v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
Consequently, the average consumer has to rely on other material in the branding to indicate origin.Further, given the congestion of similar logos in the marketplace, the Court found that, if a consumer cares about the brand they are purchasing, they must pay attention to the branding – particularly given the above-average prices of the market segment. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Graham v. [read post]
