Search for: "Goodwin v. United States Government" Results 61 - 80 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Since the landmark judgment in the case of Goodwin v. the United Kingdom in 1996, the European Court hung several wagons on this locomotive judgment of source protection. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:01 am by Schachtman
  The symposium was sponsored by the United States Department of the Interior, in May 1973. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by Rick Hills
Attorneys and federal postmasters, entitled to make policy for the federal government free from state oversight even when no bona fide federal agency is checking their work. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
From 2007 to 2013, Justice Kruger was an assistant to the United States solicitor general. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Goodwin for the Murder of Albert D. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am by Jeff Gamso
United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
Nelson, a case about information privacy and government background checks; Snyder v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming, noting that at “issue is not just Lee’s fate, but also the Court’s view of the state of plea bargaining in this country. [read post]