Search for: "Grant v. Livingston" Results 61 - 80 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff on the seizure claim. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
" The Gillespies made no payments on their loan between December 2008 and April 2010, but were granted four deferments of their repayment obligations extending from February 1, 2010, through May 31, 2011. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals disagrees, killing off the habeas petition.The case is Waiters v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:51 pm by Liisa Speaker
The Michigan Court of Appeals in Estate of Aaron Reid v ThomasWalker, No. 328587, reversed the circuit court’s summary disposition ruling as to one defendant and affirmed as to two others in an appeal involving the death of bicyclist. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Lynch and Walker) upholds summary judgment. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:56 am
Ratner Paul Williams & Laura Livingston, reviewing Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War, by Orde F. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury awarded each of them $18 million, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Restivo v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ferrari drove wildly while under the influence.The case is Ferrari v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
 Is a formal notice by someone to prevent the proving of a Will or the grant of administration of an Estate. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Challenge to Will based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence rejectedIN RE ESTATE OF TORNABENDOCKET NO. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Dave
 In Birmingham CC v Stephenson [2016] EWCA Civ 1029 (not on Baili yet, but we have seen a transcript), the Court of Appeal considered whether a possession order granted in respect of an introductory tenancy was wrongly granted where an Akerman-Livingstone Equality Act style defence was raised (alongside an Article 8 defence). [read post]