Search for: "Grant v. Public Works, Dept" Results 61 - 80 of 377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2013, 4:31 am by Jon Hyman
Justice & Public Safety Cabinet Dept. of Juvenile Justice (6th Cir. 1/3/13) provides an example of how these principles can play out. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:02 am
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (4): Bayview Trading Group v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
  Granted, some courts, even in that context, consider factors similar to those considered in attorney work product cases, though presumably as a matter of the exercise of sound discretion. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 8:10 am by Dean Freeman
Dept. of Public Safety that a deputy injured in a crash after attending a work-related luncheon was not compensable because the pair were not required to attend and therefore it was not “work-related. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
An "Administrative action is arbitrary when it is without a sound basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts," noting C.F. v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 191 AD3d 52 and other decisions cited in the opinion; and 3. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
An "Administrative action is arbitrary when it is without a sound basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts," noting C.F. v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 191 AD3d 52 and other decisions cited in the opinion; and 3. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
PROPERTY - HOMEOWNERS - PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM FROM POST-FIRE REMEDIATION WORK - MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY - FRYE HEARINGO'Brien v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
For publication opinions today (4): Bobby Robinson a/k/a Steven Smith v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:12 am
Civil Service Commission’s jurisdictional reclassification of 29 titles to the noncompetitive class violated Article V, §6’s merit and fitness mandateMatter of Brynien v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
As Justice Holmes stated in Crowley v Pulsifer (137 Mass 392 [1884]): It is desirable that the trial of cases should take place under public eye, not because the controversies of one citizen are of public concern, but because it is of the highest moment that those who administer [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Brian Greer
This distinction is important to understanding how derivative classification and declassification work, as explained further below. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
At the core of these principles is an important new one, though one that waits for greater elaboration elsewhere--the need for reasoned decision making subject to broad review by the courts (e.g., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court rejected the individual’s claim that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under Education Law §3020-a, and the award terminating petitioner's employment is a violation of public policy and New York State Law.Perry v Comm. of Labor, App. [read post]