Search for: "Grass v. People" Results 61 - 80 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Super. 384, 389 (App.Div. 1960) (fall over low wire fence separating grass plot from sidewalk).Nary v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:08 am by Amy Howe
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this preview ran on August 8, 2016, as an introduction to the blog’s symposium on Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
May not be case by case but we have to figure out where and why to draw lines, some of which will be normative but not all.McKenna: surveys directed at words—Gucci v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:25 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  What they saw was a mangled bus with students climbing out of the windows and jumping into the grass. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 8:33 am
Trump and the Republicans, while robust, has been driven chiefly by small checks from his grass-roots supporters. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:11 am by Amy Howe
The lower courts were also wrong, Trinity Lutheran contends, to the extent that they relied on the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Locke v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 12:03 pm by Michael Lowe
If the DEA does as some hope will happen, the federal classification will change to either Schedule II, or maybe even lower down the scheduling list, to a Schedule III, IV, or V. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:10 pm by Daniel Nazer
This week marks the second anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Alice v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: At least 7 injured in Georgetown wreck, April 17, 2016, The Boston Globe, By Adam Sennott More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:57 am by SHG
But the question of whether the infliction of pain is an acceptable use for getting someone to comply with a cop’s command, even if the person poses no threat of harm to the cop, was the core issue before the Fourth Circuit in Armstrong v. [read post]