Search for: "Guy v. Benefits Review Board" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
” In addition, and as can be common in trading chat rooms and message boards, the banter between traders reportedly includes boasts about the ability to manipulate the market, as well as sharing market-sensitive information.[18] Whether those comments are actually true or not, the potential implications will be taken seriously by regulators given the climate and recent issues concerning rate manipulation surrounding Libor. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am by William Gould
”  At this point, Justice Scalia added, to laughter from the audience, “[a]nd he’s a big guy. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 2:37 pm
  But the Benefits Review Board says "No way." [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
That said, of the 1,130 participants whose profiles Sweeney reviewed, only 579 had provided their full zip code, date of birth, and gender in the relevant fields. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am by Bexis
”  Instead, the seminal commercial speech case, Virginia Board v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So it has to review the standards governing who is a "domestic worker" or simply a member of the household for whom the FLSA does not apply. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Any claim that this Act was designed to benefit the small entrepreneur is simply not true. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]