Search for: "HALL v. POWELL"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Hall, 626 A.2d 997 (Md. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:37 am
This decision is the long awaited sequel to Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2010] 3 WLR 1441 (case comment here) where a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court held (in the context of demoted tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V, Ch 1A) that where a local authority bring possession proceedings relying [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:18 am
Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] WLR (D) 64 “In all cases where a local authority was seeking possession of a property which constituted a persons home, including persons who had been granted introductory tenancies pursuant to Part V of the Housing Act 1996 and persons who had been granted a licence of property under the homelessness regime in Part… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:11 am
The judgment in London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (Aka, Powell, Hall and Frisby) is out. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:11 am
The judgment in London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (Aka, Powell, Hall and Frisby) is out. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
The UKSC judgment in Birmingham CC v Frisby, Leeds CC v Hall, Hounslow LBC v Powell is due on Wednesday 23 February (court Room 1 at 9.45). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
The UKSC judgment in Birmingham CC v Frisby, Leeds CC v Hall, Hounslow LBC v Powell is due on Wednesday 23 February (court Room 1 at 9.45). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
This appeal from the Court of Appeal, where it was known as Salford CC v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, was heard on 23-24 November and concerns the applicability of ECHR, art 8, to mandatory possession proceedings brought by local authorities in two contexts, namely: introductory tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V (Frisby [...] [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Latham v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
McGreal, The Making of the Supreme Court's Free Exercise Clause Jurisprudence: Lessons from the Blackmun and Powell Papers in Bowen v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Hall and agreed with Mr. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
Although the Supreme Court won’t actually be hearing the appeal in Salford v Mullen in November, it will be hearing the appeals in the cases of Hounslow v Powell, Leeds v Hall and Birmingham v Frisby. [read post]
