Search for: "HASH v STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
  Plus it's in state court, which means he likely gets out in two and a half. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am by Bryce Klehm
  The United States faces persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns that threaten the public sector, the private sector, and ultimately the American people’s security and privacy. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:38 am by Josh Blackman
And, casebooks will probably add this decision to the early chapters on the right to exclude–alongside State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:17 am by Kirk M. Hartung
Thom Tillis, R-N.C., former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel and former USPTO Director David Kappos, who stated that the “misinterpretation of Section 101 of our patent laws has created an unintelligible hash. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
The trio argue that the current state of patent eligibility doctrine is “an unintelligible hash” causing significant systemic problems. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]