Search for: "HAUSER v. HAUSER" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court decided the case Riegel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court decided the case Riegel v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:23 am by Brian Leiter
Gilbert Harman has posted a revised version of his earlier remarks, along with a reply by Marc Hauser. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:36 am by phillipsacademy
  Yesterday, Harvard announced a landmark new gift: $40 million to catalyze innovations in learning and teaching from Rita and Gustave Hauser. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:42 am
Last month's order by Mr Justice Newey in The Hedgehog Golf Company Ltd v Frank Hauser [2011] EWHC 689 (Ch), in the Chancery Division for England and Wales, was one such instance. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
In the Hedgehog Golf Company Ltd v Hauser [2011] EWHC 689 (Ch) (23 March 2011), Mr. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:07 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) L & R v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 649 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bayfine UK v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 304 (23 March 2011) Baturina v Times Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 308 (23 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) National Westminster Bank Plc v Binney [2011] EWHC 694 (QB) (23 March 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) The Hedgehog Golf Company Ltd v… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:03 am by R. David Donoghue
., Partner at Sidley Austin LLP, will address the impact recent cases such as Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:06 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
., Partner at Sidley Austin LLP, will address the impact recent cases such as Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
Not only would the members of the Hauser Global group and any other group at the Law School not stand for it, I feel absolutely confident that neither would you Dean Revesz. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court and American society at large, even post Lawrence v. [read post]