Search for: "Harrington v. Harrington"
Results 61 - 80
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2007, 1:46 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:26 am
Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:32 am
That was very much on display in Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in today’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
In Harrington v Simpson, No. 142546, Justice Markman dissented from the decision not to hold the matter in abeyance pending oral argument and decision in Hoffner v Lanctoe, 489 Mich __ (2011). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 5:42 pm
The case was Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:13 pm
Illinois law is clear that punitive damages may not be recovered in legal malpractice claims. 735 ILCS 5/2-1115.The unpublished opinion, dated May 5, 2010, in Noonan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:43 am
Habeas Corpus Standard of review 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) applies to a habeas corpus petition, even though the state court’s order was unaccompanied by an opinion explaining the court’s reasoning. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:46 pm
Harrington, No. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:53 am
Harrington v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 11:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
The transcript of the Supreme Court argument in Harrington v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:57 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Warger v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
Knox v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:47 am
Justice Kagan has been recused (presumably by herself, though the Court doesn't say) from two habeas cases from the Ninth Circuit: Harrington v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:26 pm
We had racked up major victories settling long-standing and important problems with decisions such as Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:33 am
The cases are Harrington v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:30 pm
L.V. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Monday, August 23: Petitioner’s reply in Harrington v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:11 am
ShareIn this installment of our new video series on advocates in merits cases at the court, Nate Mowry interviews Carl Cecere, who represents a group of Canadian municipalities and First Nations in the bankruptcy case Harrington v. [read post]