Search for: "Harris v. Comfort" Results 61 - 80 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
What brought this issue to my mind was reading the transcript of oral arguments in Florida v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
 The judgment, which may be read with ease and comfort by anyone who is fluent in legal Dutch, is here. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Scalia discusses the Court’s 2007 in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
 The fate of three-time-relist Harris v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by Chris Seaton
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm by Jerome H. Juday
Supreme Court’s recent decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm by Melissa Hart
California Teachers Association and revisits the question of the constitutionality of public-sector union agency fees, which it considered just a few years ago in Harris v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
“The word ‘class’ comfortably encompasses a group of people linked by nationality,” said the court, particularly when the statutory text itself allows the president to suspend the entry of “all aliens. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:26 am by Ezra Rosser
 Abstract below: This Article posits that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Benjamin Wittes
According to Shane Harris, writing in Foreign Policy: The same day, lawyers for the Electronic Frontier Foundation read Walton’s ruling and wondered why he didn’t acknowledge an order to preserve records that the group had sought in another lawsuit over government surveillance, Jewel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by John J. Sullivan
  The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter had it. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]