Search for: "Hatch v. State Bar"
Results 61 - 80
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
* Also, the political activities of State and municipal employees whose employment is federally financed, in whole or in part, may be further restricted by the federal Hatch Act [53 Stat. 1147].Essentially, the Hatch Act bars State and local officers and employees from being candidates for public office in a partisan election,** using official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the results of an election or nomination and directly or… [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
However, the court’s ruling in Acorda, by establishing specific jurisdiction based on filing an ANDA with plans to sell the drug in a state, arguably makes the high bar for general jurisdiction established in Daimler of little significance in ANDA cases. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
It will continue to work, barring something unexpected. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
Nov. 5, 2015) (the Bankruptcy Code precluded an FDCPA claim for a time-barred proof of claim); Neal v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 12:30 pm
Orren Hatch (R-UT), together with Sen. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
Instead, it is more likely that the affiliate hatched and executed the attack on its own, raising serious questions as to how much control the group’s leaders actually exercise over its affiliates. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
United States, 273 U.S. 236 (1927) and TransCore, LP v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:33 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:55 am
Pa. 2014). [6] Id. at 534-35. [7] FTC v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am
At Discourse, the UCLA Law Review’s online publication, Senator Orrin Hatch weighs in on the ACA subsidies case, King v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
The controlling case is Robak v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
Christopher Coons (D-Del.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) introduced the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2014 in the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:27 am
The case is Franzman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
First, a top hatch (“manway”) is opened, usually by Lubrizol workers. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
As compared to the House bill, the Leahy bill would raise the bar on what such applications must state. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Following its June 2, 2014 deadline for Phase 1 input, the Bureau has posted submissions from (1) the Canadian Bar Association (“CBA”), (2) the American Bar Association (Antitrust Section) (“ABA”), and (3) Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (“Rx&D”). [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:13 am
Id.at 28.The various rationales offered by the plaintiffs were rejected, starting with Hatch-Waxman. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
