Search for: "Hepburn v. Hepburn"
Results 61 - 80
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:34 pm
Kramer v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider whether the Court of Appeal misinterpreted the Companies Act 1992, s 272 as being applicable, and whether it erred in disturbing Hepburn J’s conclusions on the law. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
***** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
DeTorres III, M.D., P.C. v Claxton-Hepburn Med. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:17 am
In yesterday’s case (Bouchard v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:45 am
Hepburn prepared his second report of October 27, 2009. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:51 am
Hepburn represents Vicky; and Kenneth W. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Dewitt (1869), Hepburn v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Dewitt (1869), Hepburn v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal of England and Wales confirmed this in the recent Fenty v Arcadia litigation [the Rihanna case]: "[t]here is in English law no "image right" or "character right" which allows a celebrity to control the use of his or her name or image" [here]. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm
McBride, Hammer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:48 pm
In today’s case (Gulamani v. [read post]
