Search for: "Hill v. State Bar of California" Results 61 - 80 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
As a matter of reality on the Hill at this point, it appears clear (at least for now) that Chief Justice Roberts will not preside at Trump’s second trial. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Quoted in Trump courts new controversy with travel ban expansion, The Hill (Jan. 23, 2020). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[20] Although the parties are not obligated to reach their ultimate contractual objective, the parties are barred from renouncing the deal, abandoning negotiations, or insisting on conditions that do not conform to the preliminary agreement.[21] This category is commonly referred to as a Type II agreement.[22] Third, the letter of intent can be completely nonbinding. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Dianne Feinstein of California – grilled her on the role of her Catholic faith in judging. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:26 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  Menkel-Meadow teaches at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by John Ross
Fifth Circuit: It is, notwithstanding Justice Alito's suggestion in Reed v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
State Bar of Wisconsin, a First Amendment challenge to Wisconsin’s mandatory bar membership and dues system. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
Statutory and Categorical Exemptions Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. [read post]