Search for: "Hill v. Texas Government" Results 61 - 80 of 389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is terrible that none of the current justices has ever run for, or therefore served, in any elected office at any level of government. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:24 pm by Amy Howe
” Thomas compared the majority’s approach in this case to what he characterized as its “erroneous decision in Hill v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Emma Snell
  Moldovan MPs have passed a ban on Russian war symbols, including the letters Z and V and the St George ribbon. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Bollinger, or using race "as a factor of a factor of a factor" as the University of Texas did in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Special Operations Centre will respond in “real time” and is staffed by native speakers, The Hill reports. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 17 February 2022, Richard Spearman QC handed down judgement in Hills v Tabe [2022] EWHC 316 (QB) in favour of the Claimant. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The challenges arose out of one lawsuit filed against Harvard University and one against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill by a group called Students for Fair Admissions. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The vote amounted to a bitter but unsurprising finale for the Democratic voting rights effort on Capitol Hill, a campaign backed by top party leaders and pushed by key elements of its coalition even as Sens. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
., from the K Street lobby firms to the halls on Capitol Hill. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
FLASHBACK FRIDAY In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Daniel Tokaji, dean and professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School, argued that two decisions from the 2016 term of the Supreme Court—Bethune-Hill v. [read post]