Search for: "Hogan v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office):"Today's ruling enjoining the PTO from implementing its controversial rules on continuations and claims is a sound decision that reflects the concerns we expressed in our amicus brief. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:22 am by Benjamin Wittes
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 10 (D.C. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am by Eoin Daly
Instead, while only briefly considering the religion ground – implicitly viewing this as bolstering the Article 41 “Family” authority of the parents – Hogan J decided the issue in the frame of the Article 42.5 test of whether “moral and physical” failure on the part of parents warrants protective State invasion in the Family unit – with regard to the “natural and imprescriptible rights of the child”. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:33 pm by Ortiz Law Firm
First Unum Life Insurance Company that was decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:06 pm by Jacek Stramski
The Court ruled that the framework created by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
Commentary Eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court decided Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
Introduction To attain the office of the Chief Justice of the United States is to reach the culmination of one's legal career. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
United States, 361 U.S. 416, 423-24 (1960), overruled on other grounds by Burks v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Daniel Brooks of Hogan Lovells, Werit’s solicitors, introduced the case. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Supporting this conclusion, the Tribunal referred to other legislative changes in jurisdictions like the United Kingdom, United States and the European Union, where transsexualism was considered a form of sex discrimination. [read post]