Search for: "Hollister v. Hollister" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
 Around this time last year he found himself in the Court of Appeal in  Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd - an account of profits case that reversed His Honour Judge Birss QC's (as he then was) decision (see AmeriKat's report on the appeal here). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:22 am
The jiplp weblog features a review by Mr Justice Arnold on the economics of copyright which concludes with an expression of regret that it was not available to the Court of Appeal when it adopted the incremental costs rule in Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1419 [on which see the AmeriKat's posts here and here]. [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
However, following the Court of Appeal’s decision in Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Limited [2012] EWCA Civ1419, some commentators believed that defendants would be unable to deduct general overheads (ie overheads that support the defendant’s business in general, such as rent, management and advertising) from their profits after direct costs (such as VAT and cost of purchasing or manufacturing the infringing items) had been deducted.And so it was that Jack… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm by Jamie C. Chanin
Hollister School Dist., 11 Cal.App.4th 1598 (1992) (school district could not eliminate post-employment health benefits, even though district’s resolution adopting benefits did not expressly promise those benefits would not be eliminated in the future);  Youngman v. [read post]