Search for: "Holman v. Holman"
Results 61 - 80
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
From Holman's biotech blog:Tuesday, November 24, 2015The Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:14 pm
Pre-nuptial agreement was erroneously entered into evidence because it was relevant to an affirmative defense, not plead.Lavonne Carol Holman, Respondent, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court hears argument in Bowman v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:35 am
The Court of Appeals distinguished this case factually from the Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision in Holman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:41 am
The Supreme Court issued its ruling in Magwood v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:12 am
By Chris Holman Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:51 am
Berlex Labs v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC upholds patentability of drug dosage method claim: Prometheus v Mayo (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (Patents4Life) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) (Patent Docs) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Mircera (Recombinant erythropoietin) – US: CAFC: Section 121 ‘safe harbor’ provision does not apply to… [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:37 pm
By Chris Holman Much has been already been written about the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Amgen v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:57 am
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 6 As if to confirm that housing law is, well, complicated, there is a coda to the Supreme Court decision in Manchester City Council v Pinnock, which has led to a supplementary judgment being handed down. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:35 pm
Prakash, Tempest in an Empty Teapot: Why the Constitution Does Not Regulate Gerrymandering Colleen V. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:40 pm
Watson)Chris Holman's summary of petitioner & amicus briefs in Bowman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm
By Chris Holman Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 2:15 am
Holman, 221 Neb. 730, 380 N.W.2d 304 (1986). [read post]
11 May 2010, 10:45 am
In Dorsey v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:45 am
An example of this appears in the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Genentech v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:00 am
(Patent Docs) Roundup Ready Soybean: Infringement of US patent: Monsanto Co. et al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:34 am
"- i.e. that that it was incumbent upon the applicant to prove there was a marriage valid or void according to the lex loci celebrationis, as had been decided by Mr Justice Holman in Dukali v Lamrani [2012] EWHC 1748 (Fam).Counsel for the 'wife' argued that:"...the requirement on the applicant was to prove the divorce etc. was entitled to recognition as valid in this jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:36 am
Holman, 2010 Ill. [read post]
