Search for: "House v. Hastings"
Results 61 - 80
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
., Kimsey v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:01 am
” This also applied to Part VII Housing Act 1996 inquiries – R v Kensington and Chelsea LBC, Ex p Bayani (1990) 22 HLR 406; Cramp v Hastings BC (2005) EWCA Civ 1005, (2005) HLR 48 at [58]; Williams v Birmingham City Council (2007) EWCA Civ 691, (2008) HLR 4. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
And the relevant case, Nixon v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
Even ordinary employment law or housing law plaintiffs may not want future employers or landlords to reject them as dangerously litigious.[13] For good reason, most lawsuits are nonetheless litigated in the parties' own names. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
[Baron's Hasting Const. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Among the visionary features of the original Constitution worth celebrating are: (1) its first words, “We the People,” which (as Chief Justice John Marshall would remind everyone three decades later in McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 8:24 am
In a watershed decision in Gideon v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
(We all remember how a tight timeline affected the quality of judicial work product in complicated election matters in Bush v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
In two earlier columns (the second of which is here) we discussed McConchie v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A podcast on Buchanan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Today marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
V, § 48.2. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
In one action last Monday, the Court denied the request for review (known as a petition for a writ of certiorari) in the case filed by the Pennsylvania Republican Party (Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The reversal in course in California v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Recall that the House impeached Trump on January 13 while he was still in office as “the President. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
June 12, 2002)(rejecting negligence claim brought by family of gardener who was shot when an abusive husband came to a house where his wife was temporarily staying); Apolinar v. [read post]
