Search for: "Houston Production Co. v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the complaint, Litepanels states that the Proposed Respondents import and sell products that infringe the asserted patents. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:59 am by Sergio Leal
For example, on April 11, 2011, Judge Hoyt from the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that Texas law is on the carrier’s side when it comes to examinations under oath. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am by Marie Louise
s missing fair dealing circumvention exception (Michael Geist) Copyright lobby group makes the case for flexible digital lock rules (Michael Geist) Europe Belgians, Brits can carry on watching World Cup footie for free: Cases T-385/07, T-55/08 and T-68/08 FIFA and UEFA v Commission (IPKat) Nigeria Nigeria develops own IP for voter registration (Afro-IP) Spain Spanish Academy Awards tainted by anti-piracy law controversy (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Court confirms: IP addresses… [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 7:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent & Trademark Office, 2010 U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, August 11, 2010 International Minerals Technology, LLC, of The Woodlands, Texas, has agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the federal Clean Water Act at its Tetra Micronutrients production facility in Fairbury, Neb. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am by Josh Wright
”  Recall the Supreme Court’s decision in Granholm v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The settlement is part of a broader arrangement as Houston-based Lyondell, working to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization, spends $250 million to help fund cleanups of 15 hazardous properties around the nation. [read post]