Search for: "I v. B"
Results 61 - 80
of 27,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 6:10 am
As I noted in my last post on Rule 404(b) evidence, even when the evidence is relevant to an issue other than propensity or disposition, admissibility is “constrained by the requirements of similarity and temporal proximity. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
For summer recreational reading, I recommend Unfair to Genius: The Strange and Litigious Career of Ira B. [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:17 am
Our office recently received notice of approval of an I-601 waiver application (waiver of excludability under the Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(a)(9)(B)(v) – unlawful presence in the United States). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:56 am
See Matter of B-Z-R-, 28 I. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
Because of (3), the judge granted judgment as a matter of law to Hargis on (1), since fraud on the PTO invalidates the entire registration.B&B Hardware Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
§ 2250(a)(2)(B). [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:10 pm
On January 29, 2012, I wrote about a Ninth Circuit decision, Oshodi v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:17 am
In Black v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm
I told her about the hotel room and the sports memorabilia. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:23 am
Campaign Legal Center v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
The legislative framework predicated (i) bail on the individual being detained, and (ii) temporary admission on a person being either liable to detention or being detained. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:31 am
I have a preview essay at SCOTUSBlog on Shapiro v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:31 pm
I agree with Steve that the time has come to revisit Section 102(b)(7). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:05 am
Thus, the respondent violates paragraph 4(b)(i) if it is found to have registered or acquired the domain name “primarily for the purpose” of holding it for ransom. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:09 pm
Yesterday's planned webinar on Gallagher v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:07 pm
B. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:59 pm
Patent and Trademark Office filed its reply brief with the Federal Circuit in Exelixis, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
I attended the oral argument this morning in United States v. [read post]
