Search for: "I. v. D."
Results 61 - 80
of 33,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2008, 3:43 pm
Missouri V. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 11:25 am
Martin Surfacing, 263 F.R.D. 47 (D. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:03 am
Before I finally commit to upgrading to Stata v.11 I'd appreciate any comments (pro or con) from anyone already using it. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:07 pm
(The creativity can't be based on functionality) D. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
I. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
In Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:47 am
When I served on the D. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:53 am
For those South Florida criminal defense attorneys who like to follow the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court, I thought I’d let you know that oral argument occurred in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Regina v Grout [2011] EWCA Crim 299; [2011] WLR (D) 70 “Care had to be taken when drafting a count in an indictment alleging an offence contrary to section 8(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 because that section created at least two separate offences: (i) causing a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity and (ii) inciting a child under 13 to engage in a sexual activity. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Vaughan v Vaughan [2010] EWCA Civ 349; [2010] WLR (D) 95 “When a judge was determining (i) a husband’s application to terminate a financial obligation to his former wife and (ii) the former wife’s application to capitalise the obligation, and he was comparing the financial needs of the former wife and a present wife, there remained a presumption that on marriage each spouse took the other subject to all existing encumbrances, whether known or not. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
If so, I'd be interested in the prison dynamic between Henry and his certain cellmate Macbeth. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 6:21 am
The judgment of D NJ was affirmed.Judge Moore cited Ormco v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 2:49 am
E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:59 am
I strongly disagree with at least part of the recent opinion of the Eleventh Circuit in Lloyd v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 5:45 am
I think I'd rather be in Texas. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:06 am
R (Parish) v Pensions Ombudsman; [2009] WLR (D) 86 “Where the ultimate question to be determined by the Pensions Ombudsman in an investigation differed from the ultimate question which had arisen in previously begun court or employment tribunal proceedings, s 146(6)(a)(i) of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 did not preclude an investigation by reason of a [...] [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:51 pm
OKAY, I’M PRETTY MUCH OVER THE ELIZABETH WARREN STORY, but I’d be remiss not to mention this music video. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:44 am
The magazine lost an appeal in its "The Park Cities Welfare Queen" case (D Magazine Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
