Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 2 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW"
Results 61 - 80
of 283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
This requirement was aimed at chilling the efforts of itinerant, out-of-state screening physicians, whose conduct came under scrutiny in In re Silica.[11] Daubert, Its Progeny, and Amended Rule of Evidence 702 The Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert was not only a watershed in the analysis of expert evidence generally but also reflected specific concerns about expert testimony in the area of product liability litigation. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
On June 3, 2016, the trial court entered amended findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of the judgment. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
P. 41(a)(2)(E). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
In view of Article 2(2) EPC, national law under Article 139(3) EPC should apply to two identical European patents granted in a situation of internal priority. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
” Id., n.2. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
He and other DRE’s are trained to follow the DRE protocol to: (1) rule out alcohol as a source of impairment, (2) determine whether the suspect is impaired by something, (3) rule out a medical condition as the source of any observed impairment, (4) if a medical condition is ruled out, render an opinion as to which of 7 categories of drugs is or are causing the impairment, and (5) secure a sample of the person’s blood or urine for… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:16 pm
In an initial effort to respond to these developments and pressures, EBSA amended the general standards for delivery of required disclosures in 2002 by establishing a regulatory safe harbor for the use of electronic media (the “2002 safe harbor”) under 29 CFR 2520.104b-1(c). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
After deliberations, only 10 of the jury members found that the government had proven its case. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
By 2:30 AM, she was up and vomiting. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
Whereas Rule 64(b) EPC 1973 had required "a statement identifying the decision which is impugned and the extent to which the amendment or cancellation of the decision is requested", Rule 99(1)(b) and (c) EPC only required "an indication of the decision impugned" and "a request defining the subject of the appeal".The letter of 17 March 2015 was not simply a mere debit order; it also contained an indication that it related to the filing of an… [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
I-2 U 31/16). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
| Fordham 27 (Report 3): DMCA - 20 years later | Fordham 27 (Report 2): IP - Past, Present & Future | Fordham 27 (Report 1): Key Current IP Issues: Reflections & Analysis | Event Report: IPAN World IP Day Celebrations | German Federal Court of Justice refers new case on communication to the public | Non-traditional trademarks and other amendments to the Mexican IP Law (Second Part) | Follow the IPKat page on LinkedIn! [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:24 pm
Amendments to Court of Chancery Rules of Procedure: The Court of Chancery Rules are modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which were recently amended. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Ruth Soetendorp reviews Intellectual Property, Finance and Corporate Governance, by Janice Denoncourt. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
| Fordham 27 (Report 3): DMCA - 20 years later | Fordham 27 (Report 2): IP - Past, Present & Future | Fordham 27 (Report 1): Key Current IP Issues: Reflections & Analysis | Event Report: IPAN World IP Day Celebrations | German Federal Court of Justice refers new case on communication to the public | Non-traditional trademarks and other amendments to the Mexican IP Law (Second Part) | Follow the IPKat page on LinkedIn! [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
Sekumade later amended his pleadings to drop his breach of contract claim and to assert a claim for violation of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act ("DTPA"). [read post]
