Search for: "IN RE APPOINTMENTS OF MEMBERS TO THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT"
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
In 2014, the State Council announced a “re-organized” and re-named CAC that was concurrently the state counterpart of a secretive CCP cybersecurity leading group’s general office. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
Holly McMahon and General Charlie Dunlap and to other members of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
State law bars professional or volunteer lobbyists from donating to statewide candidates during the legislative session. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court battle. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:26 am
Two Alternate Positions is being advertised for the OSN Supreme Court to fill the term of office per recommendation by the OST Law and Order Committee of The Oglala Sioux Tribe. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:53 am
Convey the message to your employees that you’re available and approachable. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:53 am
Convey the message to your employees that you’re available and approachable. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
On April 3, 1976, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Ron Basford, announced to the Victoria Bar Society: (1) “a major re-assessment of the rules of evidence using the draft Evidence Code of the Law Reform Commission of Canada as a frame of reference”; and, (2) that he had appointed me to conduct a national consultation process. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Now They’re Scrambling. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Kozlowski, 80 N.J. 378(1979); In re: Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381 (2002); Devaney v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:35 am
From the States and Municipalities: Colorado – Colorado Supreme Court Hears Dispute on Whether Legal Fees Count as Political DonationsDenver Post – Tom McGhee | Published: 5/2/2017 The Colorado Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could decide whether free, or reduced-cost, legal services provided to political groups should be considered contributions under the state’s campaign finance law. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
And this is why the House and Senate Judiciary Committees need to investigate what really happened here. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:00 am
Supreme Court called for additional briefing on whether the court was authorized to settle a dispute about congressional subpoenas for President Trump’s financial records. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm
” There is nothing on his website about the Tulia cases or his numerous violations of the Professional Conduct Rules. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
Canada Canada – Federal Court of Appeal Dismisses Challenges of Ethics, Lobbying Commissioners Appointment iPolitics.ca – Marco Vigliotti | Published: 2/13/2020 The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed a complaint from a watchdog challenging the government’s appointment of new ethics and lobbying commissioners in Canada. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:20 am
We’re the voters, remember? [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
In birth defects litigation, the problem of “cherry picking” is so severe that one of the leading professional societies concerned with birth defects has issued a position paper to remind its members, other scientists, and the public that “[c]ausation determinations are made using all the scientific evidence”: “Causation determinations are made using all the scientific evidence. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court to give minority voters a greater voice and trigger a [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:00 am
Capitol was displayed outside a house owned by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
