Search for: "IN RE RAMBUS" Results 61 - 80 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thompson: Consumers don’t know what they’re not getting. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Albert: Not if they’re doing it independently. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:33 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In the most important ruling ever on causation and standard-setting, In re Rambus, the D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
Dickstein Shapiro (Patently-O) ITC: No s 337 violation; investigation terminated in Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same involving complainants LSI and Agere (ITC 337 Law Blog) Fleshing out design patent infringement doctrine: Crocs v ITC (Patently-O)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Billingnetwork Patent – Court orders plaintiff to file separate patent suits against each defendant: Billingnetwork Patent, Inc… [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See:The Reexamination Center Executive Interview: Richard Levick on “Reexaminations and the Media” -- Rambus Management, please read and note highlights--> If you are challenging a patent, and the outcome is positive for you, the same viral news dissemination puts an enormous burden on the defending company to explain the result to their shareholders and other vital constituents. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
After a successful initial effort at the ITC, Rambus lost one patent, and part of another, at re-exam, but still has one patent, and part of another.See Rambus wins over Nvidia at ITC [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
Google (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI finds particular machine: Ex Parte Moyer (12:01 Tuesday) ITC: Initial determination finding violation of section 337 in investigation concerning semiconductor chips following complaint by Rambus against NVIDIA, Asustek, and others (ITC 337 Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple - Apple receives iPad patent on eve of launch date (Daily Dose of IP) Cognex – ITC terminates investigation of Amistar concerning certain machine… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
lanka (Class 46) The beer name no one wants to protect – geographical indication cancellation application (Class 46) PDO costs too high for Höllen Sprudel – another cancellation application (Class 46) FRANDly EU decision in Rambus case (IPEG) Recent EPC rule changes restrict filing of Divisional Applications (Patents4Life)   France Tribunal de Grande Instance finds infringement in Evac c.s. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
 (Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ’s grant of Rambus’ summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)… [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) ACS:Law and Logistep currently seeking settlement from around 6000 alleged file-sharers but ISPs doubt accuracy of evidence (TorrentFreak) We should have embraced Napster says BPI boss Geoff Taylor in op-ed piece for BBC (Ars Technica)   United States US General – Decisions 9th Circuit: Anti-spyware company protected by 47 USC 230(c)(2): Zango v Kaspersky Lab (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents How to patent software… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media Research Inc (PatLit)… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46)   Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog)   Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen… [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:34 am
  It has deflected or lacked the opportunity to review significant lower court decisions including Rambus, Microsoft, PeaceHealth, LePages, Dentsply, Spirit/Northwest, Conwood, Concord Boat, American Airlines, Beech-Nut/Gerber, Broadcom/Qualcomm, Virgin/BA, and Pepsi/Coke. [read post]