Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2021, 9:44 am
Alders v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:12 am
An initial proposal must, among other things, “identif[y], and outline[] steps to support, local and regional broadband planning processes or ongoing efforts to deploy broadband or close the digital divide” and “describe[] coordination with local governments, along with local and regional broadband planning processes. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
The United States faces persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns that threaten the public sector, the private sector, and ultimately the American people’s security and privacy. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
A few weeks back, in Meriwether v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:10 pm
As EFF, Article19, and Privacy International stated in PIETRZAK v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 3:59 am
Wirecard AG v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 5:15 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or… [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The United States needs a constitutional amendment. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:06 pm
There are more than 213 million registered voters in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In the United States, though, the test was prohibited by the sclerotic Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 9:26 am
Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
