Search for: "In Re: Amendments To The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (Notice)"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Rick Scott June 22 and took effect July 1, violates the Florida Constitution. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Here are the Rules that have been amended: Appellate Procedure Rule 9.050 is being added to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.050. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Here are the Rules that have been amended: Appellate Procedure Rule 9.050 is being added to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.050. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
The order comes just weeks after the appellate court granted the Obama administration's request to expedite the case.The government hopes to overturn U.S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:51 pm
The Florida Supreme Court is About to Join the Fray Then there’s the 4th DCA’s decision, En Banc, to certify to the Florida Supreme Court a “question of great public importance” (for jurisdiction-conferring purposes under Rule 9.030 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure) in Pino v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
Maples involves “whether a failure to satisfy a state procedural rule in a criminal case could be excused if the convicted individual was blameness for the failure, and the state had some role in the default. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
GIBSON, JR., individually, Respondents. 2nd District.D&O Insurance: FLORIDA APPEALS COURT REVERSES D&O SETTLEMENT-OFFER RULING, Arrowood Indem. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Oregon Healthcare Res., 6 No. 18 Westlaw Journal Medical Malpractice 1, Westlaw Journal Medical Malpractice February 11, 2011An Oregon couple who conceived a child after being told that the husband's vasectomy was successful are seeking more than $675,000 in child-rearing expenses from the doctor who allegedly botched the procedure. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Rules of Juvenile Procedure -- Amendment -- Detention hearing -- Presence of counselIN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 8.010. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
The appellate court reversed for noncompliance with the rule, ordering a new trial. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
This article provides an overview of this new law.Act SummaryH.B 10-1394 (Construction Professional Commercial Liability Insurance Act or Act) amends CDARA and the Colorado Insurance Code by codifying certain interpretive rules for occurrence-based liability policies insuring construction professionals. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”Finally, Olson said, “I would not rule that out, Justice Stevens. [read post]
16 May 2010, 1:33 pm
Because probate is an in rem proceeding where the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure generally don't apply. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
The Court now told the lawyers to address much broader issues about the relationship of corporations to the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:19 pm
The committee notes reflect that (d) was amended “to clarify that 90-day period pertains to service of hearing notice, not the actual hearing date. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice the agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
’ (Patently-O) Recent USPTO roundtable – proposed BPAI Ex Parte Appeals Rules modifications (Daily Dose of IP) (Inventive Step) USPTO announces interim procedure for patentees to request patent term adjustment recalculation (Anticipate This!) [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
