Search for: "In Re: Apple Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2013, 5:01 am
”See In re Hauserman, Inc., 892 F.2d 1049, 15 USPQ2d 1157, 1158 (Fed.Cir. 1989) (unpublished)(quoting Arvin Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 pm
Apple, Inc., 12-cv-01529-JST (N.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:33 pm
See In re Baxter Int'l, Inc., 698 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:36 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
In any event, the Court found that those elements do not suffice to counterbalance the clear differences existing between the conflicting marks on a conceptual level.In addition, the Court noted that the marks did not share the concept of a ‘fruit with a bite taken out of it’ [So, what you're saying is we can have an apple but we can't take a bite out of it? [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:24 pm
A tussle this week between prominent investors and Apple Inc. over iPhone use by young people comes amid a nascent re-evaluation of the smartphone’s social consequences within the industry that spawned it. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:24 pm
A tussle this week between prominent investors and Apple Inc. over iPhone use by young people comes amid a nascent re-evaluation of the smartphone’s social consequences within the industry that spawned it. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 5:38 am
No company’s branding strategy is studied more meticulously than Apple, Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm
Fogleman, 607 F.3d 161, 167 (5thCir. 2010); see In re Pirani, 824 F.3d 483, 493 n.1 (5th Cir.2016). [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
Once you're past the PTAB, the appellant needs to satisfy Article III standing requirements (but not before). [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
In re Honeywell Inc., 8 U.S.P.Q.2d 1600, 1601-02 (T.T.A.B. 1988). [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
Second brief on cross appeal due 02/22/2022 for Apple, Inc.. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:50 am
See, e.g., In re Apple Inc., 979 F.3d 1332, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:06 am
Prods., Inc., 334 F.3d 1274,1279 (Fed. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 2:18 pm
You're not going to read this opinion unless you're a super nerd; or perhaps care deeply about appellate jurisdiction over nonfinal orders for federal discovery for use in a foreign proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
Cal.), February 6, 2023: Defendant Apple Inc.'s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action ComplaintThe hearing will be held in two weeks, and given the current situation in the Northern District of California, there is a fairly high probability of Apple's motion succeeding. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 4:50 am
The case is In re Apple Inc. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 7:42 am
Issue preclusion is a res judicata theory. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:46 am
In re Tri-Coastal Design Group, Inc., Serial No. 85302240 (July 25, 2013) [not precedential] [APPLE BROWN SUGAR for bath soaps, lip gloss, scented oils].In re Douglas John Shuntich, Serial No. 85369587 (Auguest 5, 2013) [not precedential] [SUPERCOOLER for countertop and portable household refrigerator/freezer].In re Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc., Serial No. 85445340 (August 6, 2013) [not precedential] [NATIONAL PLAY CATCH MONTH for… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:07 pm
Daniel Robinson in Support of Ex parte Application (In re: Ex Parte Application of Apple, Inc., et al.) [read post]
