Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron"
Results 61 - 80
of 318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
See In re Chevron, 109 F.3d at 1020. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
See In re Chevron, 109 F.3d at 1020. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
See In re Chevron, 109 F.3d at 1020. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
For example, in In re Chevron Intellectual Property Grp. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
Its greatest product, of course, is the invention and re-invention of itself to suit its clients--including its enemies. [read post]
Letters Rogatory and Subpoena for Documents in US: Fed Court Issues Subpoena for Republic of Ecuador
11 Oct 2010, 4:31 am
The case is In Re Repubic of Ecuador (ROE) . [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
If you’re not yet a member, try a no-risk trial now. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
In re Griffin Trading Co. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Australian legislatures are not frequently having to re-draft legislation in response to court decisions which interpret administrative powers differently from the way they are understood by the executive (though there are some examples). [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:20 am
“And here’s the kicker: They’re right. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm
A spokesperson for the defendant stated in 2014, We’re going to fight this until hell freezes over. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
The government told the court of appeals that, if the validity of its rule (re)interpreting the machinegun statute "turns on the applicability of Chevron, it would prefer that the [r]ule be set aside rather than upheld. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
§ 1.704(c)(8).Note that Chevron and Cuozzo are cited:Under the review provision of the APA applicable here, a court mayset aside the PTO’s actions onlyif they are “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
On the other hand, Justice Alito's absence from this statement is interesting in light of Justice Alito's fervent defense and application of Chevron deference in his solo Pereira dissent. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:32 am
One last chance, as Richard Re might call it. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:16 pm
[2] In re Henriksen, 399 F.2d 253 (C.C.P.A. 1968) [read post]