Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron" Results 61 - 80 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by Ted Folkman
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by Ted Folkman
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by Ted Folkman
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Australian legislatures are not frequently having to re-draft legislation in response to court decisions which interpret administrative powers differently from the way they are understood by the executive (though there are some examples). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A spokesperson for the defendant stated in 2014, We’re going to fight this until hell freezes over. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The government told the court of appeals that, if the validity of its rule (re)interpreting the machinegun statute "turns on the applicability of Chevron, it would prefer that the [r]ule be set aside rather than upheld. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 1.704(c)(8).Note that Chevron and Cuozzo are cited:Under the review provision of the APA applicable here, a court mayset aside the PTO’s actions onlyif they are “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am by Jonathan H. Adler
On the other hand, Justice Alito's absence from this statement is interesting in light of Justice Alito's fervent defense and application of Chevron deference in his solo Pereira dissent. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:32 am by Josh Blackman
One last chance, as Richard Re might call it. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:16 pm
[2] In re Henriksen, 399 F.2d 253 (C.C.P.A. 1968) [read post]