Search for: "In Re: Cook, et al v. Cook, et al" Results 61 - 80 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Cooking food to a temperature of 185∞F or higher will inactivate hepatitis A. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Shaw Environmental, 11-71, is almost certainly being held for the Solicitor General’s brief in Cook v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Leaves to Appeal Civil Procedure: Document Retention/PreservationFontaine et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]