Search for: "In Re: E.G. Appeal of: E.G."
Results 61 - 80
of 4,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
" Since the individual can't bring his own claims in court, he can't still have his representative claims in court either.But the Court of Appeal says: "Uh, actually, Supreme Court, you're wrong. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:53 pm
(emphasis added)So we're talking about five teen moms out of 27 teenage girls, not 31 out of 53. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:58 am
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that re-registration of a domain, from an individual to a company jointly owned by the individual, is not a “registration” under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 10:38 am
McKay of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:01 pm
¶¶ 72– 73); see also, e.g. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
In re Rikard, 161 N.C.App. 150 (2003), In re J.F., 237 N.C.App. 218 (2014), In re D.A.H., 277 N.C.App. 16 (2021). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:58 pm
Well, now, that's unusual.You're used to seeing child molestation cases in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
These principles were established in the first decisions taken on petitions for review (see e.g. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:11 am
Many people use the terms assault and battery interchangeably, e.g., first comes the assault and then sometimes the battery. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:40 am
(E.g., Rich v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
#abaclc #RT @jottaviani: #abaclc link 2the In re Rolondo S case mentioned by @ericgoldman http://t.co/GAJvUNzu #RT @FlemingMF: Goldman: “Teenage boys should not be trusted with the Internet. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:43 pm
[New Yorker] * If you're looking to purchase ancillary legal services (e.g., business or litigation support), check out the Buying Legal Guide, just launched today by the Buying Legal Council and Legal.io. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:06 pm
If you're already ahead on paper, all oral argument can do is give the other side a chance to make up for lost ground. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:19 am
See, e.g., Hewlett-PackardCo., 281 F.3d at 1267 (“Even if the goods and services inquestion are not identical, the consuming public mayperceive them as related enough to cause confusion aboutthe source or origin. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:13 pm
See, e.g., N/S Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:38 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision today in Jones v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:14 am
How do you think the appeal came out? [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:58 am
Your prize could be one of your legal services, e.g., an hour of your time. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:20 am
(See, e.g., Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
That's definitely not the way the Court of Appeal goes, though. [read post]
